Good week for television

Jan 31 2010

Two electrifying programmes came across the airwaves this week. (Or in my case, wobbled through the air via the wireless router. Another blow for alien enthusiast Frank Drake.)

The first was President Obama’s appearance at the Republican Party’s retreat in Baltimore. In an hour-long broadcast, he responded to questions from GOP representatives. It was intense, entertaining and enlightening.

Republicans said that the Democrats were aggressively controlling all business in the legislature, and limiting their access to the president. Obama told Republicans that they had painted themselves into a political corner by consistently condemning Democratic proposals. For the politically inclined, it was phenomenal entertainment.

The week was also the final match of the Australian Open: Federer vs. Murray. Federer is a tennis god: sleek, cool, colour-coordinated and majestic on court. When he wants to challenge a call, he simply waves his racket nonchalantly toward the ref.

Murray is a British hero–the country’s only chance at a serious tennis victory in nearly a century. Unfortunately, he’s also young, gawky, and has the reputation of being downright dour. Though I have an ingrained desire to support underdogs, even I couldn’t root too hard for Murray.

Television is typically full of so much rubbish that I gave my set away. This week, I wished for it back! I know that not every programme can be about a world championship sports game or cover a historically significant debate, but is there any reason for shows like “Britains Missing Top Model”? Or “Bridezilla”? I’ll never race home to watch that crap, and I’ll never set my Tivo to record it. Why is it so hard to find compelling content on TV when the web does so well?

No responses yet

Survey findings

Jan 29 2010

In the past week, more than 60 frequent cyclists participated in my survey about commuter safety. Here’s a summary of their responses. (If you ride a bike and would like to add your own input, you can still access the survey here.)

  • 91% of respondents reported wearing a helmet.
  • 91% said they use lights.
  • 32% reported using reflective gear.
  • 51% reported having at least one accident or near miss while riding on city roads.
  • 27% explicitly referenced multiple incidents or close calls.

The respondents were also clearly impassioned by the subject of road safety, and were generous with their free responses. Here is a selection of representative comments:

“Have actually clipped a pedestrian who stepped out in front of me from behind a parked car. Couldn’t swerve because I would have gone straight into oncoming traffic.”

“Too many incidents to count. Most common is pedestrians stepping out on to the road without looking, right in front of you, and cars pulling out of junctions without noticing you. Parked cars opening doors right in front of you is fairly common as well.”

“I have been hit by three cars when riding. In every case it was the fault of the driver, who didn’t see me when they pulled out of a junction or from parked. All these incidents happened in daylight.”

“Never had a proper accident, but many near misses due to drivers not seeing me until the last second.”

Quick and dirty analysis: Many respondents were confident in their ability to anticipate and avoid most accidents, but still considered commuter riding to be dangerous. Despite widespread use of safety equipment, participants still thought drivers and pedestrians were frequently unaware of their presence. As a result, many respondents had experienced accidents of varying severity, which frequently resulted in damage or injury.

Thanks to everyone who participated in the survey so far. Your thoughtful responses are a tremendous help as I continue to develop my new product. Special thanks to the Edinburgh University Cycling Club for their emphatic participation. There’s a clear opportunity to make commuting safer for all road users. I’m going to give it my best shot.

No responses yet

Busy-ness

Jan 27 2010

This week has been all about momentum. With my first business pitch in two weeks, I’ve been steadily developing the case for my new bicycle safety device.

Progress so far:

1. Coined a new name. “Whirlybird” was never going to cut it. A first pass search reveals no competition with the same moniker.

2. Collected feedback from more than 60 regular cyclists about road dangers. They love to talk about near-death experiences. Absolutely the easiest survey I’ve ever administered.

3. Spoke to researchers at the University about physical requirements for the product, and the practicality of the idea. They flagged several areas for further research, but also gave me some real scientific meat for the pitch.

4. Researched road casualty statistics. Lots of recent articles have highlighted cyclist injury and death rates, but the most alarming figures come straight from the National Statistics Office.

5. Spoke to a representative from the National Guide Dogs Association for the Blind. Who knew they were concerned with bicycle safety issues? They’re publishing research on this subject in the next few weeks. Put a note in your diaries! This one’s going to be a page-turner.

6. Brought on another team member to focus on tech. We had a meeting this morning over bad instant coffee.

Next steps: Buy a new filter for the cafetiere. Build a specific story for the pitch. Solidify market figures. Finish physics degree.

2 responses so far

Market research

Jan 24 2010

After several minutes of concentrated thought and effort, I have invented a new product (at least in my head). The judges in the University of Edinburgh’s Business Idea Competition thought it might have legs, so I am now committed to pitching the project to a panel of judges in early February. The competition will be stiff, and there’s a whopping £250 on the line.

“Amazing!” you’re thinking. “If only I could help!”

Good news: you can. The following link will take you to a survey I built to do preliminary market research: click here to take survey. If you are any kind of cyclist, please take five minutes to answer the survey. Your participation is invaluable. Literally.

If you’re not a cyclist, but happen to be a product designer, I have a proposition for you. It involves designing a new product that may eliminate all hate in the world by 2015. (At the very least, it will prevent several unnecessary accidents.)

If you’re neither a cyclist nor a product designer, but you still want to help, I also have a job for you. But you might have to give me a few more hints about your skills.

Many thanks!

Your pal 4 ever,

Hilary

One response so far

Things to do before Phil’s parents arrive:

Jan 21 2010

1. Design a new blog. Make sure numbered lists look amazing.

2. Do a cost-benefit analysis about whether to polish the fireplace and hearth. Two thoughts: if polished, the hearth will significantly increase the danger of walking through the living room, but it will also shine brilliantly.

3. Do a cost-benefit analysis about whether to keep the new dress. Yes, it is electric blue with snakeskin fabric accents, but on the other hand, it’s one-of-a-kind and made by a real-live fashion designer from Bristol. Perhaps ask for a vote when everyone is here.

4. Rig the polls.

5. Clean the bathroom. Consider novel bathroom-applications for furniture polish. Will it make the windowsill shine? Will it make the tub impossible to stand in? Some basic user-testing may provide useful information.

6. Buy white wine and milk with the blue label. (Phil’s parents prefer it to the green labelled milk.) Staying hydrated is important.

7. Hoover everything.

8. Serve eviction notice to mice under the couch. Google falconry and cat adoption in case mice refuse to leave.

No responses yet

Halloween planning

Jan 20 2010

Halloween can sneak up on you. Every year, thousands of procrastinators are caught off-guard, and are forced to queue for hours in the Grassmarket for a chance to buy googly-glasses and fake swards from the costume shop. Avoid that fate. Plan ahead. Here’s some costume ideas to get you started.

1. Stealth. Build a suit made entirely of mirrors to reflect radar from your person. Avoid right angles. This costume has an added benefit: though everyone will see you coming, they’ll assume you’re a disco ball. How’s that for stealth?

2. Animal mummy. National Geographic can give you plenty of hints. Basically, the mummified man is way overdone, but his furrier, equally dessicated pals? Novel. Another bonus: you can re-use your old Scooby-Doo costume.

3. Plus size model. Let’s face it, you’re probably not skinny enough to be called a “regular” model. So take one for the team, and help break down the “size issue” that permeates the media. If you don’t have any ideas for an outfit, you could probably start by combining the two costumes above. Sequins and faux fur are both in this season.

One response so far

Event planning checklist

Jan 19 2010

Most well-regarded events share a few key traits, many of which have little to do with the main focus. The majority of the griping heard at conventions revolves around the quality of the lunch and the timeliness of the coffee. These are legitimate complaints. More importantly, such mishaps affect attendees’ willingness and ability to stay engaged, network and otherwise enjoy the day.

Planning for the upcoming Edinburgh Sockcamp is underway, and I don’t want to lose sight of the small stuff amidst the noise of selecting a venue, inviting speakers and building the workshops. So here’s a brain dump of niggly things that I want to keep front and center.

Must haves:

1. Coffee and tea on arrival. Start the day fresh.

2. Name badges. There are too many names to remember.

3. Ice-breaker to introduce all the attendees. Lay the groundwork for more efficient networking, and get energy levels up.

4. Paper and pens for people to take notes. Lots of people will forget to bring their own. Plus, you now have the ability to launch a spontaneous paper airplane competition.

5. A speaker. Let’s not forget the big picture: that’s why we’re here.

Nice to have:

1. Printed agenda for all tables/attendees. You don’t have to stick to it, but at least people will know when they can expect lunch.

2. Feedback forms.

3. Printed lists of all attendees and their businesses (and their email addresses?). Again, to support networking.

Don’t have:

1. Apologies. It’s best not to have anything to apologise for, but if a PowerPoint is screwed up, or the technology’s not working, try to skip the “sorry’s” and get straight to a workaround.

2. No prepared questions. (I know, it’s a double negative.) Have something to say to your speakers when they arrive, and something to ask after they’ve finished speaking.

3. Egregious changes to the schedule. Kindly enforce time limits for breaks, speakers and workshops. Everyone will be glad.

2 responses so far

Resolution evolution

Jan 17 2010

What will they be next year?

2007 Resolutions:
1. Be on the top co-ed team in the nearly-deadly Kindrochit Quadrathlon.
2. Get an average of 80 percent or higher in my physics degree.

2008 Resolutions:
1. Complete the Meadows half-marathon.
2. Get a first class physics degree.

2009 Resolutions:
1. Sign up for a race of some kind.
2. Get as close to a first class degree as possible.

2010 Resolutions:
1. Buy some trainers.
2. Take better notes and stay awake more in lectures.

No responses yet

Sticky thoughts

Jan 17 2010

You learn new things every day, but occasionally, you come across a new idea that changes the way you work and live. In the last few months, I’ve found two ideas particularly “sticky”.

1. No one wants to read your writing. This comes from a presentation about writing good web copy. The speaker could have said “less is more”, or “brevity is the essence of wit”, or “write for your audience, not yourself.” Instead, he said this, which I think amounts to much the same thing, with all the pleasantries stripped away. I think it’s quite catchy, as far as thoughts go.

2. Internet browsing is like doping. This conclusion comes from a study of internet users’ brain activity. The researchers found that surfing the web frequently induces a dopamine response—basically, a chemical reward—that compels individuals to stay online. After reading this, I  became much more self-conscious about compulsively reading the news, or checking Twitter. It actually feels like I’m just placating myself.

You might be thinking, “Hey! Aren’t those statements contradictory? How is it that people are compulsively searching the web, just like drug addicts compulsively pursuing their next fix, but no one wants to read MY work?”

Well.

Maybe that’s the real question.

No responses yet

Wet, green, safe.

Oct 27 2009

These are the things I frequently am and/or hope to be when riding my bicycle.

Winter is here, so I’m having no trouble meeting the “wet” condition. It’s been raining all week. The only energy my bike requires is the additional bananas I eat after riding to school. That, and the battery-sipping lights I have to use now that it’s dark all the time. But while I wear a helmet, bright colours and reflectors, and though I try to ride defensively, safety still seems difficult to guarantee. Continue Reading »

One response so far

« Newer posts Older posts »